Introduction
Determining land use for parcels of land is important in a variety
of areas such as real estate and construction. Often the cost to send out a
team to survey the area and determine the land use is too time consuming or the
cost is too high. Remote sensing allows analysts to determine the land use from
satellite data and provide that information to clients. In this lab, the goal
is to gain experience in measuring and interpreting spectral reflectance
signatures of various surfaces using satellite imagery. After collecting the
signatures they are analyzed to determine whether their spectral signatures
verify the land use type identified on a reference image. The second portion of
the lab involves monitoring the health of vegetation and soils using band ratio
techniques. Vegetation monitoring is useful for a wide variety of professions
such as farmers and conservation scientists.
Methods
Part 1: Spectral Signature Analysis
The first part of this lab involved collecting spectral
signatures of several different surfaces from a satellite image. Google Earth
was used as a reference to identify the specific land cover type of areas on
the satellite image (figure 1).
 |
| Figure 1. Google Earth and satellite image used to collect spectral signatures. |
Once the area of
interest was determined, a polygon was drawn within the area. Then the mean
pixel values within the polygon were inputted into the signature editor where
plots of each surface’s spectral signature could be obtained (figure 2).
 |
| Figure 2. Spectral signatures obtained using polygons on the satellite image. |
Once all 12 signatures were obtained, the highest and lowest
reflectance bands were recorded for each surface shown in figure 3.
 |
| Figure 3. Spectral signatures with highest and lowest reflectance. |
Part 2: Vegetation Health Monitoring
In this part of the lab the health of vegetation was
determined using the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI).
NDVI = NIR – Red/NIR
+ Red
The NDVI tool was opened in Erdas Imagine with the specified
input image, the sensor set as Landsat 7 Multispectral and NDVI set as the
function (figure 4).
 |
| Figure 4. NDVI function. |
Finally, a band ratio using the ferrous mineral ratio was implemented
to monitor the spatial distribution of iron contents in soils within Eau Claire
and Chippewa Counties.
Results
From the signature tool spectral signature curves for each of the twelve features were obtained.
 |
| Figure 5. Standing water spectral reflectance curve. |
 |
| Figure 6. Moving water spectral reflectance curve. |
 |
| Figure 7. Deciduous forest spectral reflectance curve. |
 |
| Figure 8. Evergreen forest spectral reflectance curve. |
 |
| Figure 9. Riparian vegetation spectral reflectance curve. |
 |
| Figure 10. Crops spectral reflectance curve. |
 |
| Figure 11. Dry soil spectral reflectance curve. |
 |
| Figure 12. Wet soil spectral reflectance curve. |
 |
| Figure 13. Rock spectral reflectance curve. |
 |
| Figure 14. Asphalt highway spectral reflectance curve. |
 |
| Figure 15. Airport runway spectral reflectance curve. |
 |
| Figure 16. Concrete surface spectral reflectance curve. |
 |
| Figure 17. Spectral reflectance curves for all 12 surfaces. |
1.
While all the curves are slightly different in figure 17,
there are a couple of trends that are apparent in the curves. There are six
curves that follow the same general trend but at different respective
reflectance levels: airport runway, dry soil, wet soil, rock, asphalt, and
concrete surface. Rock had the highest reflectance out of the five and the asphalt
highway had the lowest overall reflectance. All these surface have the same
general trend because they are all similar surfaces (flat and made from
minerals). The rock had the highest reflectance because the minerals were light
colored which increased the reflectance. The asphalt had the lowest reflectance
because of the dark coloring of the surface which absorbs more wavelengths. The
second trend was the two water curves which were similar to each other because
they both depicted water, but the standing water had a higher reflectance
because it had a flatter surface that reflected energy better. Finally, the
Crops, deciduous forest, riparian vegetation, and evergreen forest all had
similar curves. These are all similar in overall shape because they all have some
form of vegetation in them and therefore they will exhibit the same overall
curve trend even though the level of reflectance may vary. The two water
signatures varied the most in trend from the other surface because its
properties are so different. In addition, the vegetation surfaces and the
ground surfaces are both located on land and thus share commonalities that the
water surfaces do not. The vegetation spectral curves differed in the NIR or band 4 from
the 6 hard surfaces because plants reflect more energy to avoid protein
deformation while the hard surfaces absorbed this wavelength.
 |
| Figure 18. Vegetation cover of Eau Claire and Chippewa Counties. |
Figure 18 is a map of the vegetation cover of Eau Claire and Chippewa Counties. This map was based on the NDVI function which measures the health of vegetation using the red band and NIR band. The northeastern portion of the map is dark green which indicates high amounts of vegetation. The eastern half of the map is lighter in color which indicates lesser amounts of vegetation. The lack of vegetation in these areas is related to cities such as Eau Claire, roads, and crop fields that may not have crops currently growing.
 |
| Figure 19. Ferrous mineral distribution in Eau Claire and Chippewa Counties. |
Figure 19 shows the distribution of ferrous minerals in Eau Claire and Chippewa Counties.
In the map overall, there is a higher
concentration of ferrous minerals in the eastern half compared to the western
and northwestern portion. Dark orange sections of the image denote high
concentrations of ferrous minerals, which would appear in the image where there
is exposed soil. Upon closer inspection, it is apparent that higher ferrous
mineral concentrations coincide with exposed crop fields and exposed soil surfaces.
This is more common in urban areas such as Eau Claire and Chippewa Falls. The light orange areas correspond to heavily vegetated areas that block the ground
surface which covers the ferrous minerals. This is more common in the eastern
portion of the map where there is more vegetation cover.
Both portions of this lab utilized spectral signature curves to determine land cover characteristics such as land cover type, vegetation cover, and ferrous mineral concentrations. The ability to use remote sensing to determine land characteristics is a useful tool that can save time, money, and resources. Remote sensing can also analyze areas that are inaccessible to ground studies. Upon completion of this lab basic skills in spectral signature analysis were obtained.
Sources
Satellite image is from Earth
Resources Observation and Science Center, United States Geological Survey
No comments:
Post a Comment